So as much as I’d like to give a lot of credence to the
panicking going on over the Supreme Court ruling this morning, there are
several ways we can look at this—no matter where you stand on the issue—and find
common ground and even a common goal for change.
First, of course, are the Christians saying that this is a
sign Christ is coming back soon. Which is awesome. But kind of unlikely since
that’s been said to be right around the corner by the original apostles.
However, I’d just like it noted that if He is about to come back and solve all of these uncomfortable problems, I think most
of the “burning” that will be happening will be of child abusers, rapists,
murderers and mutilators (and if you like bad guys getting the rough treatment, you should read my new thriller, Stranglehold, which is only three bucks on Amazon, so....), but I kind of doubt He'll be mowing down consenting adults who are actually generous, conscientious,
devoted people and happen to eschew marriage or live in a same sex one. I just,
somehow, don’t think Christ would say, “Yeah, you help the poor, nurture many
of my children, and bring joy to so many, but you’re a dude who likes dudes, so
hell it is for you!”
But, still, if you’re a Christian, this is good news!
But if He doesn’t show, we have some things to discuss.
For instance, some may cry out that making it legal is
somehow encouraging it. But, in all honestly, I can only say that the current
state of society is exactly what religious conservatives have asked for.
Of course I’ll explain.
[But not before I first inform you that I am not a legal analyst, I did not read the decision word for word, and I don’t appreciate Supreme Court judges ruling on something that has nothing to do with the nation’s Constitution, as I am a proponent of state’s rights and would rather we the people rally for our own Constitutional amendment on this issue instead (as well as for a rescinding of Amendment 17 and for the creation of an amendment for term limits)—but we’re just too busy to educate ourselves enough to manage our own freedom, because, like, our Netflix queue is getting backed up, ya’ll, so thus it is.]
[But not before I first inform you that I am not a legal analyst, I did not read the decision word for word, and I don’t appreciate Supreme Court judges ruling on something that has nothing to do with the nation’s Constitution, as I am a proponent of state’s rights and would rather we the people rally for our own Constitutional amendment on this issue instead (as well as for a rescinding of Amendment 17 and for the creation of an amendment for term limits)—but we’re just too busy to educate ourselves enough to manage our own freedom, because, like, our Netflix queue is getting backed up, ya’ll, so thus it is.]
But back to the initial subject of my exquisite insights…
For the last few decades (probably more, but I was a toddler
or unborn, so I can’t be sure), people have been harping on the shifting of
American values and how this is a Christian nation (though that is not set
forth in the Constitution, but you knew that). So Christians have demanded that
the government rule them according to a certain belief system—enacting laws,
forbidding things, granting things, going to war, etc. And so if a certain
demographic wants the government to represent beliefs (which are largely
emotional) and make laws according to the loudest cries of anguish (also
emotional), then that government will shift according to the emotional
arguments that best shift beliefs.
In essence, this is what you’ve wanted, this is how things
have always been done—emotionally. But now the tables have turned.
I’m not antagonizing you. I’m not trying to insult you. I’m
trying to convert you.
But bear with me. I
have another point to make.
As someone who was raised an LDS Christian, I cannot number
the lessons we were taught about free agency, about how we wanted so badly to
choose that we begged to come to earth and be tested, and that it was Satan’s
plan to rob us of all choice.
Well, another option for marriage has been legalized. More choice.
Could that really be a bad thing? I mean, wouldn’t it say more about a person’s
faith to have all options and choose the path your faith defines?
Now, of course, so many will come at me with all kinds of
options that should not be offered such as abortion, drugs, or other things
that threaten life and property—but this does nothing of the sort. Same sex
marriage, while new and largely untested, does not—as a concept or even in
practice thus far—threaten life or property. Bend it this way or that, give me
the worst case scenario, and, sure, you can imagine something horrible coming
of this, but that’s panicking, and that’s not reasonable.
To be honest, religions have had a bit of struggle defining
marriage throughout the centuries. And usually women were on the losing end of
these experiments. Just read the Old Testament. Give that sucker a gander and
you’ll see that men could pretty much own women at their whim. Even as recently
as the 1800’s in America, Christian religions were popping up and either
opening marriages to communal orgies or were simply allowing powerful men to
hoard wives and send younger men out of the communities to hunt for mates.
So I guess if you want to be ruled by Christian values, you’re
going to have to be pretty specific on the sect (and have all Christians agree
on this sect—hahahah, best of luck because pretty much all differing sects
think all of the other sects are dummies), and, if that sect is chosen, that
sect had better have a pretty spotless history when it comes to marital
doctrine and practice.
It isn’t possible. And while it’s scary to be ruled by
different values or no values whatsoever, that is kind of what the founding
fathers had in mind in creating a “charter of negative liberties,” so that the
federal government would have little say in the day to day dealings of American
citizens. So we don’t have to be scared. We can simply get back to basics and
get back to minding our own business.
That said, I have to say that I’m not perfect in this
regard. MYOB was not my strong suit in 2008. At the behest of my church—against
my own judgment and experience—I supported Prop 8. I hated every minute of it,
but I did it. And I paid heavily for it. And it will forever be a reminder to
me to trust myself and never allow any institution to tell me to override bigger
principles for petty ones.
And what are my principles? Do I have any values whatsoever?
And what am I trying to convert you to?
That’s easy. Libertarianism.
No, not the college campus libertarianism where they argue
for the legalization of drugs ad nauseam. (I’m a libertarian against the
legalization of drugs, but that’s for a different post.) I’m talking about the
grown up kind, where we have to come to a place of trusting good people, owning
guns because bad people exist, and diminishing the idea that government is also
religion and decides what is good and bad for us and society. If we had never
allowed government to do this in the first place, I’m not sure we’d be here. In
fact, I’m sure we wouldn’t be. Because the government would be so small and so
limited to constructing roads, maintaining a military defense, and facilitating
trade that we’d be like, “That’s nice, but just fix the potholes, please. We
got this.” And same sex marriage would be defined by whatever sect would
practice it and other sects would have a lot to say but little power to do much
about it.
Politicians, activists, cable news anchors—they’re using you
and messing with you. And they're making boat loads of money doing it.
So join with me, please, in not giving a crap. In telling your
children, “Be good, be honest, be giving, do good, work hard, and mind your own
business.” And then start voting for small government candidates. And then
start donating to charities so we take care of each other more and need
government less. Because I believe in us. I believe we’ll take care of each
other and be good to each other and find that, in this life, we’re all we’ve
got and breaking each other builds nothing of worth.